Invela's own AI-assisted human assessors engaging in dialogue with customers regarding key controls directly review approximately 40% of the controls in an Accreditation evaluation, with the remainder covered by validated assessment work performed by S&P Global's team and embedded into the Accreditation process. Human review sits alongside automation rather than being replaced by it – the controls that call for judgment, not just document matching, go through a person.
Some controls need judgment a purely automated check can't apply. Documentation review in open finance often involves evidence that doesn't reduce cleanly to a pass or fail – a policy that meets the intent of a requirement without matching its literal wording, for example. Invela's assessors handle that portion of the evaluation directly, while S&P Global's validated assessment work, already recognized in the industry, covers the rest – so the result reflects both consistent, automatable checks and informed human judgment.
-p-2000.jpg)
